My take on Chick-Fil-A and Freedom

I have thus far avoided wading into the Chick-Fil-A controversy, but there is something nagging at me I want to get out.

First, the issue is not a Christian or even faith issue. It is a Liberty issue. Do we, as Americans, or do we not have the right to express our beliefs in the public square and accept the consequences from our fellow citizens thereof? If a business or a person cannot have a political stance, and it not have an adverse GOVERNMENTAL response, such as being banned from opening stores within a city by a zoning board, then we no longer have Liberty. Fiscal consequences for a business taking a political stand are fine, I have no problem with folks deciding to follow their conscience with their money. But the .gov has NO business making decisions, one way or the other.

For this very reason, I am morally, as a Christian, opposed to all the Blue Laws, Dry Counties, Sin Taxes, Marriage Licenses, etc. that the .gov sticks its finger in. Moral and faith based decisions fall under “retained by the States and the People” pretty clearly. Institutions can set the standards for their own membership, for performing their own ceremonies or anything else as they see fit, it is none of the .gov’s business. As an example, if you want to marry someone whose plumbing is the same as yours, while I personally do not approve, if you can find a church willing to sanction it, more power to you. And, if you want to marry someone with plumbing different than yours, more power to you if you can find a church that will sanction it. And, if you want to enter a legal contract of some sort, go for it, but that has nothing to do with marriage as sanctioned by private institutions.

Christ’s message was a personal one. He did not come to reform society; He came to extend personal salvation. While there is plenty of evidence that Nations are held by Him accountable for their collective actions, those collective actions are the result of individual actions. The “falling away” of the culture is, speaking as an historian, laughable. We have never been a “moral” society. Our morays and cultural norms have been different than they are today. What has principally changed is what was once done widely in private is now done openly. Frankly, I see this as a positive. Once it is out in the open and we can talk about it, we can draw attention to the difference in outcomes between those of faith and those without. How else can we compete in the market of ideas, how else should we demonstrate Christ’s love, if it isn’t in CONTRAST to the world?

Many of my brothers and sisters who fall into the “Religious Right” category look at the way, idealized, that they believe America was in the past and bemoan the loss of civility and faith in our culture. But, when I listen to them talk, it seems they are more concerned with how they have lost pre-eminence in the culture than the real effect on the individual faith, or lack thereof, of their neighbors. We Christians, many of us, have come to accept that if we control the political power of the nation, we can set the agenda of the culture in such a way that it will discourage sin and promote faith. This is so flawed, and historically proven to be a failure, it rivals progressivism/socialism for idiocy. It is no more possible to legislate morality to the unwilling and unbelieving than it is to develop an effective planned economy or successful effort to redistribute wealth.

I put my ass on the line every day to protect Mr. Cathy’s right to run his business as he sees fit, to express his beliefs in the public square, and I truly respect his courage to accept the consequences and benefits thereof. I disagree with the position of, but equally respect, the rights of unbelievers to fiscally disagree and express their own beliefs. But, I utterly reject the right of the .gov to express an opinion either way and I join Christ in excoriating the Pharisees who would co-opt the .gov and attempt to use its monopoly on the use of force to dictate their belief system on others. And for those on both sides, the lib-progressives and the Bible-thumpers, I would ask you to consider this. Hundreds of thousands of folks, just like me, have spent the last 10 years getting shot at, blown up, separated from our families and generally getting broken down to bring a little bit of Liberty and Freedom to nations not our own. Regardless of the rightness or wrongness of that effort, if we have sacrificed so much for others, what do you think our likely reaction is going to be to having that same Liberty and Freedom curtailed at home? The world would be a much better place if folks would simply let others be and mind their own knitting. There are quite a few of us getting more than a little pissed off at the nosiness of both sides. We are only going to tolerate it so long…and we are the ones with the best and biggest toys and the knowledge to use them. A core principal of this nation is that your rights extend right up till your fist hits my nose. After that, I have the right and sacred duty to demand redress of my grievance. Well, my nose feels distinctly out of joint and I am damn near ready to press home my demands….


About cptcaveman

An Army Major, my family and I are in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. We enjoy photography, cooking, reading and outdoor sports like hunting, fishing and trapping.
This entry was posted in Community, politics, Spiritual life and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to My take on Chick-Fil-A and Freedom

  1. Glenford Mc Ewen says:

    Well said.

  2. Pathfinder says:


    Well done, Major!!

  3. aleph says:

    sorry but living outside the US empire I am unaware of this controversy. Can you please summarise it for me. I am too lazy to read 2 million words on the net to get it.

  4. cptcaveman says:

    I will try to be brief then!

    Mr. Cathy, owner and founder of the food chain Chick-Fil-A has long been known as a Christian. His stores are closed on Sunday as an expression of that. He also has a history of fiscally supporting various non-profit organizations, specifically ones that politically oposse same-sex marriage. He has also made comments, in public as the head of his company, that express his personal beliefs. For this he has been targeted by the LBTG community for “hate speech”. All that would have simply been the public discourse, but what touched a nerve was when the Boston and Chicago mayors and their zoning commissions all made statement indicating they would prohibit the company from obtaining building licenses in their towns because of his political and religious views.

    There is a VERY deep and constantly swelling sense of rage and injustice among a huge segment of the American population at the moment. Every time we see the .gov taking a bit more on itself at the expense of our personal liberties it grows and that growth has become exponential. I believe what you are seeing is that outrage finding its expression. It has little to do with Christianity and much to do with that swollen sense of outrage that exists in the electorate. And, if this Novembers elections are not a bloodbath for the Democrats, who represent the desire for more government control and regulation, it will only be because so many of us have come to see so little difference between D’s and R’s.

    My concern is that the outrage that pushes those in the middle to the ends of the political spectrum will push large segments of the population to violence before there is sufficient political opportunity for Liberty minded adults to come to power and make significant changes.

    I have studied our history all my life. I cannot draw any comparison to the sense of outrage in the populace now other than to the years immediatly preceding the War of Northern Aggression. But, this time, rather than a visible North-South divide, it is a Red-Blue divide that falls along streets, city and county lines. The result over the next years, perhaps a decade, will decide wether we continue to slide into Fascism or turn back to Libertarianism.

  5. aleph says:

    thanks – just enough to give me an understanding

  6. Kelly Bowers says:

    Thanks, my friend…. I’ve been wandering around a bit in regards to this issue along the same lines you write of in regards to marriage in particular and the larger picture you paint in regards to the “so-called” good old days.

    One thing that really disturbs me about the direction certain gov’t. officials have taken in regards to this company are the similarities to Germany and our Hebrew brethren, the early stages of where that led. We who are Christ followers are being tagged as intolerant and I see, in the not too distant future outright persecution based upon our perceived intolerance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s